Networker

Re: [Networker] Scanner command taking soooooooooooo long

2009-08-10 17:45:46
Subject: Re: [Networker] Scanner command taking soooooooooooo long
From: Preston de Guise <enterprise.backup AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:42:09 +1000
On 11/08/2009, at 07:34 , Chester Martin wrote:

One more question...

If I have multiple tape drives do I have to wait for networker to call
in tape 2, then 3, then 4?  Can I have multiple scanner jobs running
against the same saveset allowing me to run the scanner against all 4
tapes at once?

I wouldn't recommend it. These days it's considered "unsupported" to scan in a saveset in an incorrect order when it spans more than one tape, so scanning it all in simultaneously would fall into that category. If I recall correctly a discussion with a PSE, scanning a saveset "locks" that saveset in the media database, so the first scanner operation would get exclusive access to the saveset, and other scanners run at the same time would (at best) be unable to update the record.

Cheers,

Preston.

--
Preston de Guise


"Enterprise Systems Backup and Recovery: A Corporate Insurance Policy":

http://www.amazon.com/Enterprise-Systems-Backup-Recovery-Corporate/dp/1420076396

http://www.enterprisesystemsbackup.com

NetWorker blog: http://nsrd.wordpress.com


To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER