Hello,
What are the differences since the old server was removed, have you 
checked the throughput between the two servers, what is the utilization on 
the server ( old and new), could there be network bottleneck ? we need 
more info.
Thanks



jihadsoft <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM> 
Sent by: EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
04/14/2009 08:13 AM
Please respond to
NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU


To
NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
cc

Subject
It takes 20hours to backup 500GB- too much time






Hi guys,

We are using Networker 7.4.4.
We have a server with D partition 500GB of data, when we backup this 
server it takes long time to do the full backup like 20 hourse to back up 
the 500GB.
We used to have old server running networker 7.2 that backup the same 
server with the same data with about 4 hours.

Note: this server has networker (server verstion ) installed and removed.
Would you please help me to fix this problem

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by jihadsoft AT gmail DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER


To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER