Re: [Networker] disk parallelism question
2007-03-07 15:15:12
> No. But I don't know what default you're talking about.
> You can't mix 'All' and additional savesets, so neither E:\
> nor any other filesystem will be picked up unless you mention
> it explicitly.
Ah, got it. If I can't mix the All saveset, I do need another instance.
> However, if you have things in E:\ outside fo dir1, dir2,
> dir3, then they'll be missed.
>
> > I have a volume with a static set of root level directories (so I
> > don't need another client instance to pick up anything else), so I
> > don't need to add a skip directive anywhere, right?
>
> If you can guarantee that, then it sounds correct to me.
With this response I think I am set, thanks for the help.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Networker] Networker Exclude List, (continued)
- Re: [Networker] Networker Exclude List, Werth, Dave
- Re: [Networker] Networker Exclude List, Wood, R A (Bob)
- Re: [Networker] Networker Exclude List, Darren Dunham
- [Networker] disk parallelism question, Dewhirst, Rob
- Re: [Networker] disk parallelism question, Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] disk parallelism question,
Dewhirst, Rob <=
- Re: [Networker] disk parallelism question, Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] disk parallelism question, Dewhirst, Rob
Re: [Networker] Networker Exclude List, Dave Mussulman
|
|
|