Networker

Re: [Networker] Browse Time vs. Retention time for Exchange backu ps?

2006-03-21 20:09:40
Subject: Re: [Networker] Browse Time vs. Retention time for Exchange backu ps?
From: Scott Bingham <bingham_scott AT EMC DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:07:00 -0800
Hello Brian

One would have to scan the media back into the client index.

Thanks,
_Scott 

-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] 
On
Behalf Of Brian O'Neill
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 12:45 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Browse Time vs. Retention time for Exchange backups?

A client just asked me this question, and I've never thought about it 
before, and I don't do Exchange restores...

If the browse time for an Exchange backup session is set less than the 
retention time, what issues may there be in doing a restore that is 
beyond the browse time? How would one go about doing a restore?

-Brian

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type
"signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if
you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>