Re: [Networker] General sun HW performance question
2005-01-05 03:36:42
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Robert Maiello wrote:
RM> The 440 has 2 internal gigabit adapters (ce's).
RM>
RM> You might be hitting a Sun design issue? To drive one ce to 900mbit/s their
RM> blueprint says one needs several UltraSparcIII CPUs:
RM>
RM> http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0203/817-1657.pdf
Yep, but that's for the ge adapter, and not for the ce one, and for TCP in
general.
RM> See this article for some tuning that is possible;
RM> http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0404/817-6925.pdf
RM>
RM> Solaris 9 was suppose to have very good TCP/IP CPU utilization though?
I read this document, and checked if I had any problems that are mentioned
in this document. I couldn't find any signs of PCI bus congestion or any
signs of other issues that are mentioned in this document.
I think the core essence of my problem is to find out what part of the
system causes such a high load. Is it the NIC or the FC adapter? And if it
is either one, can it be replaced with a better adapter that has a better
driver and/or hardware that creates less load on the system?
Since its a V440 server with 4 CPUs, I can't add more CPU power. But
either way, I think its pathetic if you require more CPU power than that
just to drive a gig or two of I/O.
//Oscar
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
|
|