Networker

Re: [Networker] W2k Client seems to be running but does nothing

2004-11-19 10:45:35
Subject: Re: [Networker] W2k Client seems to be running but does nothing
From: Rafael Bolivar <rafael.bolivar AT BULL DOT ES>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:44:45 -0500
The information I provided was erroneus. Instead of nsrmmd, there are
nsrexec processes.

Sorry...

   Rafa.

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:22:38 -0500, Rafael Bolivar
<rafael.bolivar AT BULL DOT ES> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>we are experiencing some trouble with a W2k client SP4 running Legato
>NetWorker 7.1.1. It runs a scheduled backup every day at 02:00 AM and 2
>days ago it wasn't able to finish the backup. It started saving at 02:00
as
>normally, but when we arrived in the morning it hasn't finished the backup
>(usually it finishes about 05:00). It wasn't saving, and there were no
>errors or timeouts. We also realize that there were some nsrmmd processes
>running in the server, so we killed them and the backup finished. Is there
>any way to solve it?
>
>Some usefull data:
>
>Server:
>NetWorker 7.1.1 Power Edition
>AIX 5.2
>
>Client:
>
>NetWorker client 7.1.1
>Windows 2000 SP4
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>      Rafa.
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
>to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
>also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
>should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>