Oops, thanks for letting me know Tarjei, I appreciate it.
Sorry folks.

What I meant to say was...

Cloning is slow because it ( not a techie term) DE-STREAMS the save
sets.  This means that you may have servers 1-8 (depends on your config)
saving to a single tape.  NetWorker, when cloning, will follow server 1
across all tapes it spans until completion, then move onto server 2,
etc...  This has been our experience...
 
I could be wrong but this is what we appear to experience on with our
Win2K / NW 6.1.1 configuration.
 
Carter Fowler
Hardware Service Technician
Technology Services Division
Off: 519.661.5192
Cel: 519.870.4956
Em: cfowler AT london DOT ca

-----Original Message-----
From: Tarjei T. Jensen [mailto:tarjei.jensen AT KVAERNER DOT COM] 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 2:15 AM
To: Fowler, Carter
Subject: Re: Why is cloning so slow ?

Fowler, Carter  wrote:

>Q2xvbmluZyBpcyBzbG93IGJlY2F1c2UgaXQgKCBub3QgYSB0ZWNoaWUgdGVybSkgREUtU1R
SRUF
N
>UyB0aGUgc2F2ZSBzZXRzLiAgVGhpcyBtZWFucyB0aGF0IHlvdSBtYXkgaGF2ZSBzZXJ2ZXJ
zIDE
t
>OCAoZGVwZW5kcyBvbiB5b3VyIGNvbmZpZykgc2F2aW5nIHRvIGEgc2luZ2xlIHRhcGUuICB
OZXR
X

Those of us who read the list on the web would really apreciate if you
made
outlook send plain text.


greetings,

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=