ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] V6.2.3.0 lb device stops working with DataDomain STK L180 virtual library

2011-11-02 18:54:56
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] V6.2.3.0 lb device stops working with DataDomain STK L180 virtual library
From: Support - US <support AT GRESHAMSTORAGE DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 22:52:10 +0000
Such problems do not exist when you use an externally managed library. With an 
External Library Manager TSM is not aware of the slot count of a library, thus 
removing any dependence on TSM having pre-existing knowledge of library model 
architecture. This approach also allows for infinite scalability with no 
management impact in TSM. 

Andrew
Gresham Storage Solutions

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Nick Laflamme
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 4:08 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] V6.2.3.0 lb device stops working with DataDomain STK L180 
virtual library

Your DataDomain VTL has more than 4400 slots in it. If you can, reduce it to 
<4400 slots, and it will resume normal behavior. You'll need to delete and 
recreate the library for this to take effect, but it will work. 

I've got a PMR open with IBM and a Case open with DataDomain on this issue. I 
don't have the numbers handy, but IBM and DD are talking to each other about 
this.

Nick
 
On Nov 2, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Costa, Justino wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've just upgraded a V6.2.2.2 TIVsmSdev pkg on Solaris x86_64 to
> v6.2.3.0 and the DataDomain virtual library stopped working !
> 
> After downgrading back to v6.2.2.2, it starts working again with no
> single error whatsoever.
> 
> The errors I get (in hundreds) with TIVsmSdev  v6.2.3.0, after starting
> the server (with TIVsmS still on v6.2.2.2) and executing an "audit libr
> xxx checkl=barcode" are:
> 
> ANR8821E Barcode of element 8224, '    ', exceeds 32 characters in
> length.
> ANR8479W Unable to audit slot-element 8224 of library LIB61.
> 
> Any ideia of what it might  be ?
> 
> thks,
> Jmc