ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Stopping access to a filepool

2011-04-28 11:43:11
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Stopping access to a filepool
From: "Hart, Charles A" <charles_hart AT UHC DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:35:54 -0500
A scratch tape will only be requested from the devclass that's in the path ... 
It the Stgpool next inline from the disk pool. 

There's always more than one way to solve your challenges with TSM.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:52 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Stopping access to a filepool

This would work for existing volumes, but if it's uses a scratch pool, it could 
still try to create volumes.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:05, Prather, Wanda <wPrather AT icfi DOT com> wrote:
> Well if nothing else, this will surely do it:
>
> update vol * wherestgpool=filepoolname access=readonly
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Richard Rhodes
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:17 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Stopping access to a filepool
>
> How do you offline/stop_access to a filepool?
>
> We have been implementing a DataDomain which is accessed as a filepool.
> Prior to the DD, most backups went to the diskpool with some very large 
> backups going straight to tape.  When we would want to take the library down, 
> we would kill any processes/sessions writing to tape and then take the tape 
> drives offline.  This prevented any new sessions from trying to access tape 
> until the library work was completed.
>
> Now were trying to figure out that the equivalent process is for the DD and 
> it's filepool.
>
> Most backups still go into the diskpool, and the very large backups go 
> straight into the DD filepool.  If we want to take the DD down for 
> some reason, we would kill any processes/sessions writing directly to the 
> filepool, but we can't think of any way to prevent new sessions from trying 
> to access the filepool.   I guess I'm looking for some way to offline the 
> filepool.
>
> Any thought/comments are most welcome!
>
> Rick
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal 
> and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this 
> message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering 
> it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received 
> this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or 
> copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original 
> message.
>



--
Andy Carlson
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gamecube:$150,PSO:$50,Broadband Adapter: $35, Hunters License: $8.95/month, The 
feeling of seeing the red box with the item you want in it:Priceless.

This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.