Re: [ADSM-L] Re: Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service

Subject:	Re: [ADSM-L] Re: Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows
From:	David Bronder <david-bronder AT UIOWA DOT EDU>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Wed, 5 Jan 2011 19:56:04 -0600

Allen S. Rout wrote:
>
> I'll echo "use the CAD".  It is straightforward.

Too bad most TSM client security vulnerabilities have been in the CAD
(notably, the remotely-exploitable ones)...

--
Hello World.                                    David Bronder - Systems Admin
Segmentation Fault                                      ITS-EI, Univ. of Iowa
Core dumped, disk trashed, quota filled, soda warm.   david-bronder AT uiowa 
DOT edu

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ADSM-L] Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU Re: [ADSM-L] Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows, Steven Langdale Re: [ADSM-L] Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows, Prather, Wanda Re: [ADSM-L] Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT Re: [ADSM-L] Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows, Allen S. Rout Re: [ADSM-L] Re: Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows, David Bronder <= Re: [ADSM-L] Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows, Allen S. Rout Re: [ADSM-L] Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows, Andrew Raibeck Re: [ADSM-L] Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows, adsm mailing list Re: [ADSM-L] Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows, Andrew Raibeck

Re: [ADSM-L] Re: Memory usage issues with "traditional scheduler service" on Windows