[ADSM-L] So, did I just imagine this feature out of whole cloth? [checksum validated incrementals]
2007-11-01 10:13:53
I've "known", if I may abuse the term so, that TSM is capable of using
checksums to inform its incremental decisions for some time. But it
looks like I've just imagined this; am I correct?
I understand that doing checksum comparisons would be hideously
CPU-expensive at the client side, because you'd basically have to
re-checksum the whole box every incr. But I've got a client with a
use-case where it would actually be sane to do it, and so I went to
look for the option, and found nada; all the checksum work appears to
be validation of transport and extra paranoia bits for data in a
stgpool.
So was this entirely a hallucination?
- Allen S. Rout
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [ADSM-L] So, did I just imagine this feature out of whole cloth? [checksum validated incrementals],
Allen S. Rout <=
|
|
|