ADSM-L

Re: Bad performance from tape to tape

2002-08-15 12:32:27
Subject: Re: Bad performance from tape to tape
From: "Vos, F (Freek)" <Freek.Vos AT RABOBANK DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 17:07:59 +0100
Hi Bill,

Reclamation is not only a tape to tape copy.
The changes to the TSM database are they holding down your speed ?
The amount of tape mounts, are there many ?
Do the disks and the tapeunits share the same SCSI adapter ?

Groet,

Freek.


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:bill.boyer AT VERIZON DOT NET]
Sent: donderdag 15 augustus 2002 17:15
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Bad performance from tape to tape


The tape-to-tape operation that is adversely affected is reclamation. If the
primay location of a file is in a random access disk pool, then TSM does not
'batch' the files together. Each transaction is a single file. The primary
location can be a disk sequential access pool, but not random access. We
originally came across this with DIRMC. We had the primary a DISK pool and
then only created the copypool. The reclamation on the copypool tapes used
to take days. Opened a PMR with Tivoli and got the 'working as designed'
answer.

Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Joe Pendergast
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:36 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Bad performance from tape to tape


Is the disk pool cached?
I ran into a situation where the disk pool cache instead of tape was being
used.
This slowed my LTO drives to a crawl during certain operations.
I now varyoff the disk pools before I run the process with expected results
Don't forget to vary them back on at the end..
Note: the disk pool cache is a great help in restore time, but it can
adversely
the affect of what should be a tape to tape process.





Halvorsen Geirr Gulbrand <gehal AT WMDATA DOT COM> on 08/15/2002 03:00:23 AM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: Joseph Pendergast/Corona/Watson)

Subject:  Bad performance from tape to tape



Hi All,
I have a performance problem when doing Space-Reclaamtion, or backup storage
pool, when TSM is copying data from one tape drive to the other.
Environment:
Windows 2K server, TSM 4.2.1.15.
Library, Compaq MSL5026, with 2 SDLT drives (Single Module Library).
SCSI Controller, Compaq 64-bit/66Mhz Dual Channel Wide Ultra3 SCSI Adapter
(Compaq version of Adaptec 39160)

Moving data from Disk to Tape runs with expected speed (8-10 MB/s).

>From Tape to tape speed is around 2MB/s. (50GB takes about 7-8hours.)

Does anyone know why? It is killing my daily operations.

Mvh
Geirr G. Halvorsen
TSM Enterprise Backup Specialist
WMdata Danmark A/S

==================================================================
De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en
is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht
onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en
de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren.
==================================================================
The information contained in this message may be confidential
and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you
receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents
herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail.


==================================================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>