ADSM-L

Include/Exclude: UNCs vs. drive letters

2002-06-18 14:58:15
Subject: Include/Exclude: UNCs vs. drive letters
From: Ken Long <ken.long AT WHEDA DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:56:31 -0500
Our TSM server is absorbing the backups of many W2K servers, raising some
issues I haven't had to deal with.

How well does TSM handle UNC's in include/excludes?  Which are preferred or
easier to work with, UNC's or drive letter and wild cards?  Are there any
pitfalls I should avoid?

Also, what do I need to do differently when W2K servers use DFS in concert
with replication to "share" files/directories between servers?

Your advice is appreciated... Ken
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>