Re: TSM database maximum recommended size
2002-04-04 08:38:29
I was told by a Tivoli Engineer at one time that you shouldn't let them
grow much over 50 gb. Primarily, because of the reason you state here
about having the capability to restore. In a disaster, you need to take
into consideration how much time it is going to take you to restore that
database just to get the TSM server up and running. That time would have
to be added to the SLA requirements you might have in place to get any
application servers back up and running.
Paul Zarnowski
<vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT DOT CO To: ADSM-L AT
VM.MARIST DOT EDU
RNELL.EDU> cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Re: TSM database
maximum recommended
Stor Manager" size
<ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT ED
U>
04/03/2002 06:41 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
At 12:08 PM 4/3/2002 -0500, Scott McCambly wrote:
>How many sites are running with databases this large or larger? On what
>hardware?
Our DB is now 116GB assigned (92% full).
Hardware is RS6000/M80, 2GB RAM, SSA disks (db is mirrored by TSM)
As others have said, "it depends". If your requirement is to be able to
restore a database quickly, then your max size will be smaller.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- TSM database maximum recommended size, Scott McCambly
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size, Bill Mansfield
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size, Wholey, Joseph (TGA\MLOL)
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size, William F. Colwell
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size, Nicholas Cassimatis
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size, Sutch, Ian (London)
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size,
Brenda Collins <=
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size, Scott McCambly
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size, Roger Deschner
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size, Darrel Gleddie
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size, Darrel Gleddie
- Re: TSM database maximum recommended size, Seay, Paul
|
|
|