ADSM-L

Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape

2015-10-04 17:12:14
Subject: Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape
From: Allen Barth [mailto:allen_barth AT SCUDDER DOT COM]=20
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Joshua,

I've heard this before, but I couldn't find anyone at IBM to confirm it.
SO.........

I've been running tape and dasd thru the same FC adapter for about a year
now.  Traffic goes from rs6k to an IBM2109 (brocade) switch and then spli=
ts
from there.  I suspect the switch is handling the arbirated loop (3590) a=
nd
point to point (ess aka shark) communication conversions.

Gotchas?

Al Barth
Zurich Scudder Investments




=20

                    "Joshua S.

                    Bassi"               To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU

                    <[email protected]       cc:

                    OM>                  Subject:     Re: Bad performance
with FC attached disk and tape          =20
                    Sent by:

                    "ADSM: Dist

                    Stor Manager"

                    <ADSM-L AT VM DOT MAR

                    IST.EDU>

=20

=20

                    02/21/02 12:56

                    PM

                    Please respond

                    to "ADSM: Dist

                    Stor Manager"

=20

=20





Not only is sending disk and tape data across the same FC card a bad idea=
, I
believe IBM doesn't even support that configuration.



--
Joshua S. Bassi
Joshua S. Bassi
Sr. Solutions Architect @ rs-unix.com
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (415) 215-0326

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>