|
Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape
2002-02-21 14:01:03
|
Subject: |
Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape |
|
From: |
"Joshua S. Bassi" <jbassi AT IHWY DOT COM> |
|
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:56:06 -0800 |
Not only is sending disk and tape data across the same FC card a bad
idea, I believe IBM doesn't even support that configuration.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Joshua S. Bassi
Sr. Solutions Architect @ rs-unix.com
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (415) 215-0326
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Wu, Jie
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape,
Joshua S. Bassi <=
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Allen Barth
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Seay, Paul
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Bill Mansfield
- Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Daniel Sparrman [mailto:daniel.sparrman
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, Allen Barth [mailto:allen_barth
- Re: Bad performance with FC attached disk and tape, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
|
|
|
