ADSM-L

Re: performance question

2001-10-01 15:07:00
Subject: Re: performance question
From: Rob Schroeder <robs AT FAMOUSFOOTWEAR DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:04:16 -0500
I have tried the ftp and can transfer 500 meg in 45 seconds which is 9.7
MB/sec.  So it does appear to be TSM that is responding slowly.

Rob Schroeder
Famous Footwear




Jeff Bach <jdbach AT WAL-MART DOT COM>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 09/28/2001 05:06:44 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

Sent by:  "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:

Subject:  Re: performance question


Test FTP throughput from client to server.  Compare to backup speed.  What
are the number of files backing up?

Is the 2 Meg/sec network transfer of aggregate?

You can get up to 131 Gigs/hour using client compression.  It all depends
on
what the client, server, and network design are.
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Thorhallur Sverrisson [SMTP:thorhs AT DEMON.NYHERJI DOT IS]
        Sent:   Friday, September 28, 2001 3:01 PM
        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        Subject:        Re: performance question

        In the first place, drop the compression.  Compression is only
intended for
        slow links where the amount of data sent over the wire is impotant.
It is a
        huge CPU burden for the client to compress the data, so high
transfer rates
        are not possible with it enabled.

        Personaly I would say that any line above 2Mbits/s should not use
compression.

        Just MHO,

        Thorhallur


        On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:33:27PM -0500, Rob Schroeder wrote:
        > I am running TSM client 3.7.2 on a Win2000 server with Service
pack 2.  The
        > TSM server is Win2000 SP2 and using TSM 4.1.3.  I realize I need
to upgrade
        > the client, but I that will not happen until next week.  My
dilemma is
        > this: the server backs up to the TSM server directly to a DISK
pool that is
        > quite large, the network is Gigabit, and this client is the only
client
        > that is talking to the server.  There are no other applications
running on
        > either server.  I would expect this baby to scream, but instead
it
is
        > dogging.  I am getting just 2 MB/sec throughput and would expect
to be
        > pushing the network.  Here is the options file I am using:
        >
        > LANG AMENG
        > tcpserveraddress fftsm01
        > changingretries 0
        > resourceutilization 10
        > schedlogretention 10
        > errorlogretention 10
        > compression yes
        > txnbytelimit 25600
        > largecommbuffers yes
        > tcpnodelay yes
        > compressalways no
        > tcpbuffsize 256
        > tcpwindowsize 50
        >
        > Any ideas?
        >
        > Rob Schroeder
        > Famous Footwear


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed.  If you have received this email
in error destroy it immediately.
**********************************************************************
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>