Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine
2001-05-11 16:00:22
You definitely need enough iron to do this. It's just a question of
whether to put your servers in 1 big box or two smaller ones. We haven't
seen memory leak problems lately, so I'm not worried about that.
I agree with Richard Rhodes' comment that we shouldn't have to do this just
to get around limitations of the product, but right now that's the way it is.
At 10:31 AM 5/10/2001 -0500, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) wrote:
Hi
But memory utilization , network utilization and CPU utilization and memory
leaks will be high.
Am I right.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Zarnowski [mailto:vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 10:08 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine
The reason I would do it would be to keep the database size down.
At 11:41 AM 5/9/2001 -0400,
Robert_K_Miller/Lancaster/Corporate/Armstrong AT ARMSTRONG DOT COM wrote:
>Why would one put multiple TSM servers on a single machine?
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine, (continued)
Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine, Jeff Bach
Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine, bbullock
Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine, Alex Paschal
Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine, Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
FW: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine, Jeff Bach
Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine, PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI)
- Re: Multiple TSM* Servers On Same Machine,
Paul Zarnowski <=
|
|
|