ADSM-L

Re: SAP and 3494 performance.

2001-03-21 11:33:39
Subject: Re: SAP and 3494 performance.
From: John Naylor <John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:25:34 +0000
Bill,
I think this was to adress the single large client scenario, where migprocess=5
would not help




William Boyer <wboyer AT PTD DOT NET> on 03/21/2001 04:25:56 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject:  Re: SAP and 3494 performance.



Why not just set the MIGPROCESS=5 when you lower the migration threshold? Do
yo find the MOVE DATA more effecient than the MIGRATION processes?

Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>