Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd)
1999-10-09 02:35:09
The message I got from IBM was that every node name equals one license.
We are running an incremental archive on our main servers by using two
separate nodes and schedule incremental backups. We are saving on tapes and
reduce the time it takes us to do the archive and accepted the fact that we
need to pay for another license.
Leo Humar
LCS Pty Ltd
lhumar AT bigpond.net DOT au
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- incr backups with varying mgm (2nd), Masa, Ralf
- Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd), Richard C. Dempsey
- Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd), Leo Humar
- Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd), Nick Cassimatis
- Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd), Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd), Allen S. Rout
- Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd), Steve Harris
- Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd),
Leo Humar <=
- incr backups with varying mgm (2nd), Masa , Ralf
- incr backups with varying mgm (2nd), ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: incr backups with varying mgm (2nd), Steve Harris
|
|
|