Re: High Availability with ADSM
1999-02-12 14:15:53
Subject: |
Re: High Availability with ADSM |
From: |
Dwight Cook <decook AT AMOCO DOT COM> |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:15:53 -0600 |
I don't use "high availability" with our adsm servers...
I have configured the ssa disks in a "highER availability"
configuration where as long as the aix box itself is up, so is adsm
(based on access to its "stuff")
WHAT I THINK IBM SHOULD DO IS ! ! !
make a dsm.sys file option of a secondary adsm server so that if a
box can't contact the server and knows it has an event, it can push it
to the alternate adsm server... ( I know, dream on)
later,
Dwight
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: High Availability with ADSM
Author: JButt (JButt AT GECTS.GE DOT COM) at unix,mime
Date: 2/12/99 9:27 AM
Has anyone implemented a highly available ADSM solution.`What are the
general practices in this.
Even if you do allocate a separate server how does it work if the
primary one goes down.
Thanks.
Jawad Khayyam Butt
Senior Integration Specialist
GE Capital IT Solutions
5985 Mclaughlin Road, Mississauga, ON L5R 1B8
Tel: 905-568-9707x7151 Email: jbutt AT gects.ge DOT com
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- High Availability with ADSM, Butt, Jawad (CAP, ITS, CA)
- Re: High Availability with ADSM,
Dwight Cook <=
- Re: High Availability with ADSM, John Fowler
- FW: High Availability with ADSM, Butt, Jawad (CAP, ITS, CA)
- Re: FW: High Availability with ADSM, Bruce Elrick
- Re: High Availability with ADSM, Ray Schafer
- Re: High Availability with ADSM, Michael Abel
- FW: High Availability with ADSM, Butt, Jawad (CAP, ITS, CA)
- Re: High Availability with ADSM, Dwight Cook [mailto:decook
- Re: High Availability with ADSM, John Fowler [mailto:John.Fowler
- Re: High Availability with ADSM, Michael Abel [mailto:Michael.Abel
|
|
|