ADSM-L

OS/390 naming convention restrictions with ADSM?

1998-11-10 11:12:39
Subject: OS/390 naming convention restrictions with ADSM?
From: Cindy Cannam <CCannam AT GENAM DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 10:12:39 -0600
Does anyone know whether there is a two-node DSN MVS (OS/390) naming
restriction within ADSM? I've been trying to allocate a new device class
using a 4-node DSN, but I keep getting an "INVALID PARM" for the prefix
parameter. I had wanted a very specific DSN for each domain's offsite
purposes, but can't seem to get past this little problem. I've already
checked into any security issues, and have even allocated GDGs with the new
4-node names, but ADSM still doesn't like what it sees. The documentation
doesn't mention any restrictions either...

Any tidbits of info are appreciated. Thanks.

C.L.Cannam
Storage Management/ADSM
GENAM/St. Louis, MO/USA
ccannam AT genam DOT com
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>