ADSM-L

Re: Windows NT 4.0 (2.1.6) Backup Registry again

1997-05-05 20:06:02
Subject: Re: Windows NT 4.0 (2.1.6) Backup Registry again
From: dan thompson <thompsod AT USAA DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 19:06:02 -0500
Gerhard,

  I recommend that you view the sched.log on a test nt backup with the
exclude and include you list below.  To state the obvious, see if the log
has messages that the registry was successfully backed up (using NT's
regback to adsm.sys) as well as messages indicating that adsm.sys subidr
was backed up.  If you see the first type of messages, but not the second
then I would deduce you do need the include statements you ask about.  If
you add these include statements then obviously you should test again for
verification.  By doing this testing you will have satisfied yourself of
what is required without relying on people of unknown experience levels.

Please post back your results if you decide to run the tests.

Dan T.
----------
> From: Gerhard Ginzler <gerhard.ginzler AT AKH-WIEN.AC DOT AT>
> From: Gerhard Ginzler <gerhard.ginzler AT AKH-WIEN.AC DOT AT>
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Windows NT 4.0 (2.1.6) Backup Registry again
> Date: Friday, May 02, 1997 6:00 AM
>
> Ok, once again:
> has anyone an include/exclude list like this:
>         ex *:\...\*
>         in "*:\...\user folder\...\*"
> and can this user sucessfully backup/restore the registry?
> Or is it necessary to include lines like
>         in *:\adsm.sys\...\*
>         in *:\adsm.sys\...\*.*
> ???
> Regards,
> Gerhard Ginzler
> ========================================================================
> Gerhard Ginzler
> ----------------------------------------  gerhard.ginzler AT akh-wien.ac DOT 
> at
> Department of Medical Computer Sciences
> Vienna University - Vienna General Hospital
> Waehringer Guertel 18-20
> A-1090 VIENNA / Austria                   (+43)(1)40400-3633, -1636(Fax)
> ========================================================================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>