FW: Tape reclamation and one drive ????
1997-02-26 08:18:05
Subject: |
FW: Tape reclamation and one drive ???? |
From: |
"Pittson, Timothy ,HiServ/US" <tpittson AT HIMAIL.HCC DOT COM> |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Feb 1997 08:18:05 -0500 |
Joe,
Move data will only move files on a tape volume that haven't expired.
In
fact, when we were still running on an MVS system, I used the method Dwight
mentioned (move data volser stgpool=somediskstoragepool) instead of
reclamation because
1) We had too many tapes in our tape storage pool (6,000+)
2) At the time, reclamation was a single threaded process (think this has
since changed).
3) I could generate a list of input tapes for our operators (no automated
tape library at the time) - this kept them happier and a little more
motivated to mount the tapes in a timely manner.
4) I could run as many move data's at a time as I needed (usually 6-10).
5) Control over what got moved and when (moved the least full tapes
first).
If you do a Q VOL volser F=D, you can figure out how much data is on a tape
based upon the estimated capacity, %Utl, Volume Status (filling or full),
etc.
Tim Pittson
tpittson AT himail.hcc DOT com
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Christo Heuer
- Re: Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Dwight E. Cook
- Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Ron Heflin
- Re: Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Joe Morris
- Re: Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Trevor Foley
- Re: Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Dwight E. Cook
- Re: Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Konrad Bauer
- FW: Tape reclamation and one drive ????,
Pittson, Timothy ,HiServ/US <=
- Re: Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Sal Salak Juraj
- Re: Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Joe Morris
- Re: Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Dwight E. Cook
- Re: Tape reclamation and one drive ????, Joe Morris [SMTP:morris
|
|
|