[Veritas-bu] snapmirrored volumes question
2005-04-03 04:46:46
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] snapmirrored volumes question |
From: |
Tim Berger <tim.berger AT gmail DOT com> (Tim Berger) |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Apr 2005 00:46:46 -0800 |
On Apr 2, 2005 11:49 PM, Kennedy, Jeffrey <jkennedy AT qualcomm DOT com> wrote:
> The thing about a snapmirror *volume* is that the entire thing is
> read-only. Unlike a volume of qtree snapmirror's where the volume is
> read-write but the qtrees are read-only. This means no snapshots can be
> taken of a snapmirror'd volume. At least I'm pretty sure that's the way
> it goes. If not someone will speak up.
Sure can. That's the beauty of the R200. Snapshots "roll over", for
example, from a 960, as snapshots of the snapvaulted copy. It would
be a a real problem if you couldn't snapshot a snapmirror or snapvault
- the process of snapvaulting would corrupt an ongoing backup.
[snip]
Cheers,
-Tim
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Veritas-bu] snapmirrored volumes question, Algo Seeker
- [Veritas-bu] snapmirrored volumes question, Kennedy, Jeffrey
- [Veritas-bu] snapmirrored volumes question,
Tim Berger <=
- [Veritas-bu] snapmirrored volumes question, Kennedy, Jeffrey
- [Veritas-bu] snapmirrored volumes question, Kennedy, Jeffrey
- [Veritas-bu] snapmirrored volumes question, Kennedy, Jeffrey
- [Veritas-bu] snapmirrored volumes question, Kennedy, Jeffrey
- [Veritas-bu] snapmirrored volumes question, Kennedy, Jeffrey
|
|
|