[Veritas-bu] RE: Veritas-bu digest, Vol 1 #3828 - 9 msgs
2005-02-17 20:54:05
Subject: |
[Veritas-bu] RE: Veritas-bu digest, Vol 1 #3828 - 9 msgs |
From: |
Mark.Hickey AT hds DOT com (Mark Hickey) |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:54:05 -0800 |
What I have done in the past is to use a weekly schedule with a set backup
window, and a calendar based backup with the same window. The weekly gets
an exclude date for the window when you want the monthly to run, and a
calendar backup is set to run on those days. So you get 3 weeklies and a
monthly.
I wrote a script that uses the command line to set the exclude and include
dates. You could also use a "first Saturday" type schedule for the monthly,
and set the excludes on the weeklies around that.
Inline copies would work as well, but I wouldn't go that route for resource
reasons if I could avoid it.
Mark
P.S.: do you really have 70 policies and 7 *master* servers? This sounds
like a lot of unneccessary licensing revenue to Veritas. Why do you need 7
master servers?
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:57:17 -0500, Zermeno, Brandon (Contractor)
<BZERMENO AT intersil DOT com> wrote:
>
>
>
> What is the "best practice" on handling the Month end backups and the
weekly
> backups? What I mean is, I have Full Weekly's that are retained for 3
> months, but I also have to squeeze in the Month Ends that are retained for
1
> year. How are you dealing with this? I have about 70 policies with 7
master
> servers. We have a ton of apps that all require different settings. I have
> just been going in and modifying the retention period of the weekly's to 1
> year but this is getting old. I am thinking of doing inline copies to a
> different pool. Any ideas.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Veritas-bu] RE: Veritas-bu digest, Vol 1 #3828 - 9 msgs,
Mark Hickey <=
|
|
|