Sorry, John. You need more than two levels of incrementals to do
that. The closest you can get is to alternate an incremental with a
cumulative incremental every other day. That would result in changed files
getting backed up twice, but it would also mean a lot of tape. ;)
At 11:06 AM 10/25/00 -0500, John_Wang AT enron DOT net wrote:
>Hello
>
>I was wondering if there was a way of structuring the incremental backups to
>emulate the Towers of Hanoi algorithm described in Evi Nemeth's book "Systems
>Administrators Handbook". The goal of the Towers of Hanoi sequence is to
>attempt to have each incremental back up not only what has changed since the
>last backup but what has changed since the backup just prior to the last
>backup
>thereby automatically creating redundancy to protect against bad media without
>the overhead of tape mirroring. Of course the Towers of Hanoi algorithm did
>not really achieved it's purpose but it came close.
>
>Regards,
>John I Wang
>Sr. Systems Engineer
>Steverson Information Professionals
>
>---
>Enron Broadband Services
>3 Allen Center, Room 337C
>PH (713) 345-6238
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
>http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
---
W. Curtis Preston, Principal Consultant at Collective Technologies
Email: curtis AT colltech DOT com (Best way to contact me)
Work : 408 452 5555 (Leave a message.)
Pager: 800 946 4646, pin#1436065 (If urgent.)
Tap into the Collective Intellect (TM): http://www.colltech.com
Backup & Restore resources: http://www.backupcentral.com
|