Networker

Re: [Networker] NDMP recover question

2013-05-16 17:00:59
Subject: Re: [Networker] NDMP recover question
From: "Werth, Dave" <dave.werth AT GARMIN DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 20:54:29 +0000
Never mind, the restore finally finished.  The messages I got in NetWorker User 
were rather confusing but it doesn't appear that it actually wrote over 
anything I didn't expect it to.

Dave

Dave Werth
Garmin AT, Inc.
Salem, Oregon
-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On 
Behalf Of Werth, Dave
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:44 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] NDMP recover question

We recently started backing up our new NetApp using NDMP.  With due diligence I 
decided to do a test restore today to practice and make sure everything was ok 
on that side of things.

So I selected a small directory (21 MB, 761 files) and redirected it to another 
volume on the NetApp.  The recover appeared to run just fine but now the server 
is still reading tapes and appears to be fully restoring the original volume 
that the test restore was from.  It is saying:

"reading from Tapexxx yyy MB of 1376 GB"

1376 GB being the full backup size.

Anybody have an idea about what's going on or any advice?  I'm going to have to 
kill this before it goes on too long.

Server is NetWorker 8.0.1.1.Build.132 on Windows Server 2012.

Thanks, Dave

Dave Werth
Garmin AT, Inc.
Salem, Oregon

________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of 
the intended recipient(s) and contain information that may be confidential 
and/or legally privileged. If you have received this email in error, please 
notify the sender by reply email and delete the message. Any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of this communication (including attachments) by 
someone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. Thank you.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>