Networker

Re: [Networker] Upgrade to 7.6 series or 7.5, for Win2008 R2 support

2011-02-09 13:59:03
Subject: Re: [Networker] Upgrade to 7.6 series or 7.5, for Win2008 R2 support
From: michael.jones2 AT EMC DOT COM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:53:19 -0500
It probably does not matter from a Windows OS protection standpoint which 
version you go to, moving to the NW76SP2 Windows Client would be needed for BMR

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Leone [mailto:Michael.Leone AT pha.phila DOT gov] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 10:30 AM
To: Jones, Michael
Cc: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: RE: [Networker] Upgrade to 7.6 series or 7.5, for Win2008 R2 support

> You probably want to take a close look at the upcoming NetWorker 7.
> 6SP2 release which adds Windows Disaster Recovery (BMR) support for 
> Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2008 and Windows 7 in the 
> NetWorker client.

How can I see what is in the upcoming release? I can't even find a comparison 
for currently shipping releases. LOL

Yes, I could use BMR support for Win 2008 R2, but what release should I use 
until SP2 comes out? Would it be better to go to 7.6 SP1, then SP2? Or wait, 
and go from 7.5.2 to 7.6 SP2? 
And why?

These are the things I'm trying to figure out.

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> ] On Behalf Of Michael Leone
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 10:08 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: [Networker] Upgrade to 7.6 series or 7.5, for Win2008 R2
support
> 
> I'm currently running 7.5.2. I have a number of Win2008 R2 clients. 
> I want to get up to date, in terms of support for Win 2008 R2. It 
> appears that both the 7.5 series and the 7.6 series support Win2008 R2.
> 
> Ordinarily, I'd go for the 7.6 series, since it's a later version
number. 
> 
> I guess my question - should I stay on 7.5.x? What will that give me 
> that I wouldn't get, by going to 7.6.x? I haven't found a side-by- 
> side comparison, or recommendation, that explains why one over the 
> other. (I'm sure it exists, I just haven't found it yet ...). I stayed 
> on 7.5.x because that series seemed to get support for
> Win2008 R2 first, before the
> 7.6 series. But I gather that's changed now?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> --
> Michael Leone
> Network Administrator, ISM
> Philadelphia Housing Authority
> 2500 Jackson St
> Philadelphia, PA 19145
> Tel:  215-684-4180
> Cell: 215-252-0143
> <mailto:michael.leone AT pha.phila DOT gov>
> 
> To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
> type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
> networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with 
> this list. You can access the archives at http:// 
> listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at http:// 
> listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
> 

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER