|
Re: [Networker] DataDomain competitors
2010-09-03 03:27:16
There was a thread on the list about AFTD on top of ZFS with dedup
and the results were poor, probably because of misalignment of the save
stream on the AFTD which makes ZFS miss duplicate blocks.
Davina Treiber wrote:
On 09/02/10 09:19, Mats Atari wrote:
Hello NetWorker list.
I am keen on your advice regarding deduplication devices for NetWorker backup
environments.
I am all into doing with DataDomain, both VTL and NFS ways. However, not to
blindfold myself to much - are there any competitors, which could compare with
DataDomain today?
I don't know the market for dedup devices although I have worked with DD
lately and rather like them.
If you want cheap dedup options, there is lessfs on Linux and dedup
within ZFS. No idea how well these work.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
--
-- Yaron.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|
