|
Re: [Networker] NetWorker host: Solaris vs. Windows vs. Linux
2009-03-10 05:20:19
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, tkimball wrote:
Solaris 10 is mostly rock solid. Just don't install 5/08 or patch to it (in
particular if a T2000 or similar is involved). A network change (for
consistent network drivers) was horribly bugged, and throughput went into the
gutter on the T2K. The 10/08 release fixed it enough to make me happy to
continue.
Hi,
can you please shed more light on the T2000 issue?
We are using T2000's in various ways and are experiencing the
horrible throughput issues you describe without resolution.
We run a T5220 with Solaris 10 8/07 for Legato and so far it's doing fine
but our 20 or so T2000's are not all working very well at all
throughput wise, with Zones dropping off, sluggish response,
java performance etc.... and they are all patched towards 5/08.....
If you could steer me to more documented info I'd be very grateful!
rachel
--
Rachel Polanskis Systems Admin, University of Western Sydney
ADD Werrington North Campus (+61 2) 9678 7291 <r.polanskis AT uws.edu DOT
au>
The price of greatness is responsibility.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|
