Re: [Networker] Does cloning unmuliplex and make recovery faster?
2007-01-16 22:18:06
> I suppose when you do a stand alone clone it is demultiplexed but I don't
> think automatic clones are.
Even a standalone clone is not intentionally de-multiplexed. Of course,
even without trying to, it may become de-multiplexed if you don't clone
every saveset on the tape. If a particular section of tape has several
savesets, but only one is cloned, it will not be multiplexed on the
clone volume.
> We set Networker to automatically clone our
> backups and our weekend full backup is between 400GB & 500 GB. It takes us
> about 2.6 AIT-4 tapes for a full backup and at least 3 of the save sets will
> span all 3 volumes but I don't see the tapes being unloaded and loaded in
> the way they would have to be in order to demultiplex the save sets. It
> just loads them in order until the clone is done.
>
> So I think an automatic clone is basically just a copy of the original
> backup with the multiplexing intact.
Yes, and with automatic cloning you're likely cloning all savesets on
the volume, so the multiplexing is retained on the clone.
--
Darren Dunham ddunham AT taos DOT com
Senior Technical Consultant TAOS http://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper? San Francisco, CA bay area
< This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|