Networker

Re: [Networker] Fuji brand LTO-2

2005-09-16 10:26:29
Subject: Re: [Networker] Fuji brand LTO-2
From: Vince Howard <V.Howard AT WANSBECK.GOV DOT UK>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:24:46 +0100
Librado, 

Although we don't use LTO (we use SDLT) we have used Fuji brand
cartridges for years without any problems.  Our tape drives use hardware
compression (e.g. /dev/rmt/2cbn for Solaris).

 
Best Regards,
 
Vince
 

Vince Howard
Programmer/UNIX System Administrator
IT Section
Wansbeck District Council
Front Street West
Bedlington
Northumberland
NE22 5TU
UK
 
Tel (DDI): +44 (0)1670 843472
Fax:       +44 (0)1670 843484
e-mail:    v.howard AT wansbeck.gov DOT uk

-----Original Message-----
From: Clark, Patricia [mailto:Clarkp AT osti DOT gov] 
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 1:21 PM
To: Legato NetWorker discussion
Subject: RE: [Networker] Fuji brand LTO-2

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Librado Pamintuan [mailto:LPamintuan AT REGINA DOT CA] 
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 3:13 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Fuji brand LTO-2

Has anybody have any problem/errors with Fuji brand tape cartridges?

Do you think it's time to try a different brand of tape? I can't see no
problem with the tape drives, both are now replaced and
firmware/microcode are also upgraded to the latest. The adapter and
drive SCSI drivers are also up to date and properly loaded in the
kernel.

Big question that still keeps Legato and  Red Hat Tech. thinking and
still wondering why is that:
This tape drive or media error is only happening on our Unix backups and
nothing on Network backups, the only difference between the 2 pool is
compression. I even switched the drive - Unix is /dev/nst0 before and
now assigned to /dev/nst1, but still getting the same error/problems. So
the Fuji brand might have some issues with compression


Thanks in advance,


Librado Pamintuan
Technical Support Analyst II
Information Systems Dep.
Operations Group
City of Regina

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We've been using Fuji LTO-2 for more than a year here with no errors or
issues.  The only problems encountered have all been cable related.
Over the years I've encountered brand of drive versus brand of tape
issues.  There are just some relationships that didn't work.  I don't
know if that is still the case. 

 We are using HP Ultrium-2 SCSI drives in a Quantum M2500 library.  OS
is Solaris 9.  Clients are RHEL3, RHEL4, Mac OS X, Solaris 7, 9, & 10.  

Patti Clark
DOE/OSTI Unix System Administrator

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER



_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed.  If you have received this e-mail in error please
notify the originator of the message.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of Wansbeck District Council.

This footer also confirms that this e-mail message has been scanned
for the presence of computer viruses.

Wansbeck District Council Web Site is: www.wansbeck.gov.uk

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>