Networker

Re: [Networker] Windows 7.1.2. vs 7.1.3

2005-02-01 08:53:38
Subject: Re: [Networker] Windows 7.1.2. vs 7.1.3
From: "King, David - Eastman" <dking AT EASTMAN DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:44:21 -0500
Quite alright to vent.  I did not know about the alias problem migrating
from 6 to 7.

Thanks! 


David L. King


-----Original Message-----
From: Conrad Macina [mailto:conrad.macina AT PFIZER DOT COM] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 8:34 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU; King, David - Eastman
Subject: Re: Windows 7.1.2. vs 7.1.3

When upgrading a server from 6.x to 7.x, you have to be aware of the new
security requirement: All network interfaces on a client must be defined
as aliases to the server. Backups of any client for which that is not
the case will fail after the upgrade (and remember: there's no going
back without losing everything you backed up under 7.x).

Legato has two suggestions for identifying problem clients without
visiting each one: 1. Upgrade, see what fails and remediate the
problems; that's fine if you have a small data zone or well-behaved
clients. 2. Shut down the 6.x server, copy its indexes to another system
with the same name (so it's in the servers file of all the clients),
upgrade the server and all storage nodes and then run a savegroup that
contains all clients at level "skip".
That, they say, will identify the problem clients. Then you switch back
to your production server (downgrading your storage nodes), remediate
the clients and then do the upgrade.

Legato insists that I'm the only one who has ever complained about this.

Please excuse me, David. This doesn't really pertain to your question
about
7.1.2 vs. 7.1.3. I just saw "upgrade fro 6.1.3 to 7..." and couldn't
help venting.

Conrad Macina
Pfizer, Inc.


On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:41:58 -0500, King, David - Eastman
<dking AT EASTMAN DOT COM> wrote:

> Planning to upgrade from 6.1.3 to 7.1.2 within next few months, but 
>wonder if anyone has concerns with 7.1.3?
>
>
>
>David L. King
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via 
>email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at 
>http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can also 
>view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list 
>should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu 
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>