Networker

Re: [Networker] Merits of Linux and Solaris

2004-02-17 07:02:29
Subject: Re: [Networker] Merits of Linux and Solaris
From: Yura Pismerov <ypismerov AT TUCOWS DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:02:32 -0500
Tarjei T. Jensen wrote:

Oscar Olsson  wrote:


Also, that argument is old and maybe not even valid any more. Linux has
been just as stable, but faster, if it has been configured correctly. WIth
the 2.6 kernel series, that will probably be even more true in the future.
The problem has been support for the OS and application vendor
certification.



We have heard this for a long time. Then one does a kernel upgrade to fix
some security issues. And then things begin to break.


   But you have testing/staging environment, right ? :)
   IMHO it is all about proper change management process to prevent
unexpected problems like this.

   P.S. Like you don't have a chance to break system by applying a
Solaris patch cluster ?




In my opinion, this has been solved now since RedHat
enterprise linux is around. You get the same support you would expect from
any commercial OS-vendor. And plenty of applications have been certified,
including Oracle.



I have no experience with them.


greetings,

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=



--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=