Networker

Re: [Networker] dlt8000 sleep times

2002-09-25 18:26:48
Subject: Re: [Networker] dlt8000 sleep times
From: Thien Nguyen c6053 x5266 <ttnguyen AT EL.NEC DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:25:36 -0700
Hi Deb,

I have a Quantum/ATL P3000 with 6 dlt8000 drives.  I have to tweak several
"sleep" parameters.
Currently, here are the values:
        Eject sleep     60
        Cleaning delay  60
        Unloading sleep 60
        Loading sleep   180
I could have reduce those values a little, but they are working for me.
A label process takes about 10 minutes for each tape.  I have complained to
Legato, but not much can be done.

I also have a Q47 with 4 dlt7000 drives.  I did not have to tweak any "sleep"
parameters with this Q47 jukebox.

Regards,

Thien Nguyen
NEC Electronics Inc

============================================================================

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:58:05 -0700
From: Deb <deb AT tickleme.llnl DOT gov>
Subject: [Networker] dlt8000 sleep times
To: NETWORKER AT listmail.temple DOT edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by isdcs2.el.nec.com id 
OAA12183

I've been searching the web, looking in archives, but no juju.  We had
the Quantum Guy out here and he fixed our 2 dlt8000 drives with
swallowed tape leaders.  Did a visual inspection, found no problems with
the L1000 library, overall.  But, he did witness the problem we're
having when using Networker to control the tape transport to and from
the slots and drives.  

He believes that Networker isn't waiting long enough for the tape to 
rewind before it's ready to be moved.

My question to you all:  Have you had to tweak the "Eject sleep" and
"Unload sleep" parameters?  If so, what values work for you?  I've seen
anecdotal stories of tweaking these values, but no examples about how
long.  

The Quantum Guy called his techie who recommended 120sec for "Unload
sleep"!  The default is set to 5 sec, so 120 sec seems to be a bit
unreasonable.  I mean, if I'm labeling 30 tapes, it's going to take 2+
hours.  My DLT7000s never exhibited this problem.

I've looked at Legato's knowledge base, but nothing useful comes up.

I'm still reading my performance tuning doc... but could use some
feedback from the list.

Thanks,

deb



-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
          There are 010 types of people in the world:
      those that understand binary, and those that don't.
ô¿ô
 ~ 

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>