On 2015-04-10 01:33, Luc Van der Veken wrote:
> Even with a mail client that doesn’t have a ‘Reply to list’, it seems
> (to me) quite logical as it is now.
>
> “Reply” is private, to the author only. “Reply to all” is public, to the
> list.

...

> But everyone is entitled to his opinion. I guess that’s what all those
> flame wars were once about, or were those limited to usenet only? ;)

Strictly speaking they were about sticking the list address into a 
message: in order for 'reply all' to work that way you need the list 
address in From/Reply-To or CC. The first two come from the author and 
shouldn't be yours to change ('I guess should have author meant the 
replies to come to the list' is obviously a non-argument). Inserting 
your own address into CC before re-send creates a mail loop. Also 
reply-all then makes you receive replies twice but most of us can live 
with that.

Dima


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users