Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger: yes or no?

2014-09-18 09:15:47
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger: yes or no?
From: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 09:11:32 -0400
On 9/18/2014 6:37 AM, Roberts, Ben wrote:
> Fair enough.
>
> I used a one-liner of bash to pre-create of my volume files and fill 
> the barcodes file, then used bconsole's label command to label all of 
> them in one go.

I agree that it isn't hard to pre-create volumes and put them in the 
Scratch pool. With pre-creating, volumes are moved from the Scratch pool 
to another pool when needed. With auto-labeling, volumes are created and 
labeled directly in the pool when needed. Either way, the net effect is 
pretty much the same.

Anyway, as to the original question, if keeping the volumes for each 
client in a separate folder is a requirement, then it makes sense to 
have a separate device for each client. Otherwise, if the real 
requirement is to prevent volumes from containing jobs from more than 
one client, then a single device can still be used by having each client 
write to a different pool.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users