On 08.01.2013 21:26, Dan Langille wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We have a change request for Bacula on FreeBSD:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170882
>
> That is: all the Bacula stuff which normally fits in /usr/local/etc/
> into /usr/local/etc/bacula
>
> On the first upgrade to this changed port, your stuff would break.  :)
> You'd need to move your configuration files.
>
> For bacula client, this is:
>
> etc/bconsole.conf.new
> etc/bacula-fd.conf.new
>
> For bacula server, this is:
>
> $ grep etc /var/db/pkg/bacula-server-5.2.12/+CONTENTS
> etc/bacula-barcodes.samples
> etc/bacula-sd.conf.new
> etc/bacula-dir.conf.new
>
> But, depending on the options selected, there might be a few more
> files.
>
> Discuss.  :)

To my mind.. if a port installs only a configuration file or two, there 
is no need to put them in a separate folder. If one needs more files, 
scripts etc, more folders need to be created anyway. So I don't really 
see the necessity of this change. But on the other hand, I'm not against 
it either :)

--
Silver

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS
and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with LearnDevNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only - learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122512
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users