On 01/03/13 08:22, Gary R. Schmidt wrote:
> On 3/01/2013 11:44 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> [SNIP]
> 
>> Keep in mind that ZFS block-level deduplication is very expensive in 
>> terms of RAM. 
> I'd put it as *any* block-level de-duplication is RAM intensive... I'd 
> be very interested if someone had an algorithm that was not RAM 
> intensive - and didn't take forever to accept data! :-)


Well, true.  :)


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
  Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users