Op 20121115 om 14:07 schreef Christoph Litauer:
> Am 13.11.2012 um 09:09 schrieb Geert Stappers <Geert.Stappers AT vanadgroup
> DOT com>:
> > Op 20121112 om 13:55 schreef Christoph Litauer:
> >> Yes, I am restoring to the same server the backup was taken from.
> >> Parts of the restore got the correct user and group mapping ...
> >
> > Could it be that Samba or another file ownership remapping technique is
> > involved?
> >
> > If so, goes a restore the same way back, as a backup came?
> >
>
> no, the server is a SuSE Enterprise Linux running the bacula-fd. No
> samba etc. involved. Data goes same way there and back. Parts of the
> data is restored with correct ownership and there is no different
> handling on the erroneous restored data.
Okay.
And now is this interresting problem back on the mailinglist.
Cheers
Geert Stappers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|