Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed
2012-08-21 11:07:46
On 2012-08-21 05:42, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 21/08/12 08:37, lst_hoe02 AT kwsoft DOT de wrote:
>> Some short tests with the "Maximum Block Size" set, show transfer
>> speed to the LTO-4 of 87MBytes/sec with 256K and 98MBytes/sec with
>> 1M
>> with Bacula encrypted data, so with this we are reaching the
>> theoretical uncompressed speed of the LTO-4 device by ~20%. It would
>> be really helpful if there is some developer to say if there is any
>> downside of large block sizes?
>
> I'm not a dev, however I use 2Mb block size (this is the largest
> bacula
> currently supports)
I suspect I'm an edge case with tape. I'm using old technology and old
hardware. That's what I can afford on a home network.
I wasn't sure what block size I'm using on my DLT-7000 tape library,
but
I see it's variable....
$ sudo mt -f /dev/nsa0 status
Mode Density Blocksize bpi Compression
Current: 0x1b:DLTapeIV(35GB) variable 85937 IDRC
---------available modes---------
0: 0x1b:DLTapeIV(35GB) variable 85937 IDRC
1: 0x1b:DLTapeIV(35GB) variable 85937 IDRC
2: 0x1b:DLTapeIV(35GB) variable 85937 IDRC
3: 0x1b:DLTapeIV(35GB) variable 85937 IDRC
---------------------------------
Current Driver State: at rest.
---------------------------------
File Number: 0 Record Number: 0 Residual Count 0
All my tape jobs involve data on local HDD. That is, I backup to disk
first, then
copy to tape. The HDD and the tape are both connected to the same
bacula-sd.
> The only downside is that you _must_ mark all active tapes as "used"
> before changing block size.
Setting them as USED is fine by me. I write my tapes until they are
FULL.
Checking the recycling algorithm documentation[1], this will not affect
pruning.
> Bacula will be able to read the old tapes, but it cannot handle
> maximum
> block size changing midway through a tape.
I found one reference[2] after a bunch of searching, but I should look
more:
###
The DLT drive default data block transfer size is 4KB (4096 bytes).
To achieve better performance, adjust block size to 32K bytes or
higher when using a fixed block device.
###
My full backups, roughly 90GB, take about 12 hours to copy to tape.
Thus,
my only incentive to change blocksize is to avoid shoe-shine, which I
do not
think is happening at present.
[1] -
http://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/main/main/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html
[2] -
http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/dynaweb_docs/hdwr/SGI_Admin/books/DLT_OG/sgi_html/ch05.html
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, (continued)
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, lst_hoe02
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, lst_hoe02
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, lst_hoe02
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Sven Tegethoff
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, lst_hoe02
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, lst_hoe02
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed,
Dan Langille <=
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, lst_hoe02
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, lst_hoe02
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Dan Langille
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Alan Brown
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Phil Stracchino
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, lst_hoe02
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, lst_hoe02
- Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Linux and the LTO-4 tape speed, Dan Langille
|
|
|