Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula refusing to use existing tape and wants to label a fresh one

2012-08-11 19:04:51
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula refusing to use existing tape and wants to label a fresh one
From: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
To: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:01:51 +0100
On 11/08/12 20:56, Dan Langille wrote:


Dan,

FWIW I'm seeing the same thing. Bacula has a tape active in the loader 
already, then decides to grab another one out of the scratch pool. Once 
it's in this state, it cannot be convinced to use the existing tape(s) 
with append status

Right now i have 3 drives (out of 7) loaded with tapes from the same 
pool because of this glitch.

prefer mounted tape=Yes

This occurs across all pools to a greater or lesser extent and has been 
happening for years.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users