>>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2012 09:53:26 +0200, Tilman Schmidt said:
> 
> Due to a copy/paste error, a FileSet on one of my Bacula installations
> (Director & SD Bacula 5.2.6 on CentOS 6, FD Bacula 5.2.6 on Windows
> Server 2003) initially read:
> 
> FileSet {
>   Name = "Galadriel Archive"
>   Include {
>     Options {
>       signature = MD5
>       Exclude = yes
>       IgnoreCase = yes
>     }
>     File = "H:/Public/Archive"
>   }
> }
> 
> which did of course back up nothing at all. After removing the spurious
> "Exclude = yes" line, I was surprised to find that the next job wasn't
> promoted from Incremental to Full, and indeed only backed up those files
> which were touched since the preceding "empty set" backup. Is it
> possible that this particular modification of the FileSet definition is
> not detected as a change by Bacula?

Yes, it only compares the "File =" lines.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users