Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"

2012-05-28 09:58:52
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"
From: Sean Cardus <scardus AT zebrahosts DOT net>
To: bacula-users <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 14:38:17 +0100
Hi,

> On a Bacula installation with a CentOS 6.2 (64 bit) server
> running Bacula 5.2.6 director and SD with an HP LTO3 autoloader
> and backing up some twenty-odd machines of various platforms,
> all the jobs report "User specified spool size reached"
> much too early, currently after 1.45 GB instead of the really
> specified size of 50 GB. Example log excerpt:
[..]
> Scanning the log it looks like the storage daemon decreases its
> spool size limit every time a backup job crashes. The last time
> it used the full 50 GB was here:

I've been seeing exactly the same behaviour here (CentOS 4.9, Bacula SD 5.0.3) 
for quite some time.  However, until I saw your email I didn't correlate the 
max spool size reducing with each time a job crashes.  I can also confirm that 
whenever a job crashes, the max spool size drops.

The only workaround I can see at the moment is restarting the SD...

Sean
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users