Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] IBM TS2240 Tape Drive

2011-05-31 07:58:27
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] IBM TS2240 Tape Drive
From: Rickifer Barros <rickiferbarros AT gmail DOT com>
To: Rodrigo Renie Braga <rodrigorenie AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 08:55:43 -0300
Thanks Rodrigo...

I will really see when my tape drive arrive.


On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Rodrigo Renie Braga <rodrigorenie AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
Sorry, no experience on that specific Tape Drive, but if your OS support that hardware (i.e the devices for bacula-sd to read/write on are created), than Bacula will work without problems with it...

2011/5/30 Rickifer Barros <rickiferbarros AT gmail DOT com>
Hello Everyone,

I would like to know if somebody here have used Bacula with the IBM TS2240 Tape Drive. I will buy this Tape Drive and I intend to use Bacula in it. The TD didn't arrive yet then I couldn't test it with Bacula.

K R

Thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. 
Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic?
Nope - It's vRanger. Get your free trial download today. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>