Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] About tapes capacity

2011-04-20 10:38:32
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] About tapes capacity
From: Phil Stracchino <alaric AT metrocast DOT net>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:35:58 -0400
On 04/20/11 10:17, Jason Voorhees wrote:
> When the job started Bacula took the tape L5BA0005 and never required
> another one. As you can see Bacula apparently wrote 2,058,019,117,056
> bytes (approx. 2 TB) but my tape is just 1.5 TB capacity. Does anybody
> know why? My job isn't using compression so I really don't understand
> this.

Your *job* may not be set to use *software* compression, but is your
*tape library* automatically using *hardware* compression?



-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
  Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>