On Friday 14 January 2011 23:30:15 Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Stan:
> 
> Without commenting further on the reasonableness of your data owner's
> ideas about how to do this, the real-world chances of the Bacula
> director encountering an error increase with every successive reload
> without a restart.  The chance of a single Director instance surviving
> even a hundred successive reloads without a problem is very small.  The
> chance of it surviving 12,000 is essentially zero.

And why is that? Just because of the probability to make errors in 
configuration?

If the reload is preceded by "bacula-dir -t", it wouldn't be a problem, would 
it?

-- 
Silver

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand 
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you 
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users