Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Hardware Encryption?

2011-01-05 17:25:29
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Hardware Encryption?
From: "Edward M. Markowski" <emm AT edmarkowski DOT com>
To: Mingus Dew <shon.stephens AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 16:05:03 -0600 (CST)
here at work we do not use bacula so I can't speak to the compatibility, 
but we use the following:

Started with Netapp Datafort inline apiliances, we have around 30 of the 
deployed, they work mostly, but require more maintaince then I would like.

Our second generation solution for inline encryption is using lto-4 and 
sun T-10k native encryption.

Ed m.

On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Mingus Dew wrote:

> Fellow Bacula Users,
>     I am in search of a hardware based encryption solution that is
> OS/Storage independent. Whether it be a new drive or something else even
> Bacula compatible. The encryption provided within Bacula itself is not
> sufficient for my needs and during my last search I was unable to find an
> LTO-4 drive with encryption that was capable of encrypting tapes w/o
> interaction from the Backup program (essentially only being supported by the
> software of the vendor itself)
>
>    So some responses from fellow users on what you're doing for encryption
> of Tapes outside of Bacula would be great.
>
> Thanks,
> Shon
>
>
> 
>

!DSPAM:4d24eb1011887277626594!



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>