Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] Why isn't Bacula backing up these files?

2010-12-11 10:01:13
Subject: [Bacula-users] Why isn't Bacula backing up these files?
From: David Hollingworth <david AT tullig DOT net>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:57:47 +0000
Hi

I hope someone can help me with this question.

I am running:
*version
tullig-server-dir Version: 5.0.0 (26 January 2010) i686-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 9.10

To backup a few PC's at home. I was using bat to peruse the contents of the incremental backups of one of these PCs this evening when I found that, according to the bat version browser, a number of files that really should be in the backups weren't there! Naturally I threw my hands up in horror; if these files are missing from the backup what else is missing.

The particular backup I was viewing was of a PC running Windows Vista (32 bit) with the latest Bacula client on it. This PC is dedicated to servicing an automated weather station (aws) I run so it takes data from the aws and stores it in a number of report formats. The entire aws software set is installed in C:\vws. Here's my FileSet definition:

FileSet {
  Name = "TulligWeather"
  Include {
    Options {
      signature = MD5
      compression = GZIP
    }
    File = "C:/vws"
  }
#
# Exclude these files
#
  Exclude {
    File = *.exe
    File = *.dll
#    File = *.jpg
  }
}

Under C:\vws\data there's a number of subdirectories containing text files, things like \archive, \csv, \daily, \ globe. These all get backed up OK. However there's also a directory C:\vws\data\noaa which contains .txt files. There's one file for every month and an annual file. The current month file gets written to every 5 minutes and the annual file gets written to every hour.

So why aren't these two files being backed up as part of each daily incremental backup?

I've not specified any Accurate settings so Bacula should be using mcs. As the files are modified often each day, and certainly the monthly file grows each day, I would have though mcs would have covered it nicely.

I'm very concerned now that it appears not only are these important files not being archived; but can I trust Bacula to backup what I expect it to backup?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL,
new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, 
OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Bacula-users] Why isn't Bacula backing up these files?, David Hollingworth <=